JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 11, 2019

A- de 2019

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto la Sala Especial de Seguimiento a la Sentencia T-025/04 modifica la agenda de la mesa técnica de trabajo convocada mediante Auto 518 de 2019, en el sentido de convocar a la misma a un delegado de la Personería Municipal de Mapiripán (Meta).

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Primero. MODIFICAR la agenda de la mesa tecnica de trabajo convocada mediante Auto 518 de 2019, de acuerdo con lo dispuesto en el fundamento juridico
  2. sexto. (6o) de esta providencia.
  3. Segundo. CONVOCAR, por intermedio de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, a un (1) delegado de la Personeria municipal de Mapiripan (Meta) a la mesa tecnica citada en virtud del Auto 518 de 2019.
  4. Tercero. SOLICITAR, por intermedio de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, a la Personeria municipal de Mapiripan (Meta), presentar un informe en el cual responda las preguntas formuladas en el fundamento juridico
  5. quinto. (5o) de este auto.
  6. Este documento debera ser allegado el veintitres (23) de octubre del ano en curso. Ademas, se debera remitir una copia del mismo a la Unidad para las Victimas y la Comision de Seguimiento a la Politica Publica sobre Desplazamiento Forzado.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela